Hand Analysis: Adam Hendrix makes a four-bet on the flop at the WSOP 2025 final table

At the final table of the WSOP 2025, Adam Hendrix and Luka Bojovic engaged in an exciting battle featuring a rare four-bet play on the flop. We analyze the strategy and GTO approach.

At the final table of the 2025 World Series of Poker Main Event (WSOP), one of the tournament’s most talked-about hands unfolded—not because of massive pocket aces or a dramatic all-in, but thanks to subtle postflop play between two of the strongest contenders: American Adam Hendrix and Serbian Luka Bojovic . Although the hand began with a limp, it quickly escalated into an aggressive shootout with four raises on the flop—all in front of millions of viewers and with huge prize money at stake. Context: WSOP 2025 Main Event Final Table The WSOP Main Event is the largest annual no-limit hold’em tournament, attracting thousands of players from around the world. Making the final table is every professional’s dream, as not only are millions of dollars up for grabs, but also the prestigious title of world champion. In the hand we’re analyzing, seven players remained at the table. The blinds were 800,000/1,600,000 with a 1,600,000 ante. Player stacks: Luka Bojovic (SB) : 57,100,000 (36 big blinds) Adam Hendrix (BB) : 51,300,000 (32 big blinds) At stake were not only huge sums of money, but also the fate of entire poker careers. In such circumstances, most players would prefer a cautious strategy, especially with marginal hands. However, Bojovic and Hendrix demonstrated a deep understanding of Game Theory Optimal (GTO) play, unafraid to make unconventional and aggressive moves. Detailed Hand Breakdown: Step by Step Let’s break down the hand street by street, explaining the players’ decisions and how they align with GTO (Game Theory Optimal)—a mathematically balanced strategy that minimizes exploitability. Preflop: Limp and Check Luka Bojovic in the small blind with K♣9♠ limps (calls the minimum to see the flop). Adam Hendrix in the big blind with 6♦2♥ checks (does not raise, just sees the flop for free). GTO Rationale: For Bojovic, limping K9o is the solver’s most frequent action (86.5% of the time). Even though his stack is slightly larger than his opponent’s and there are shorter stacks at the table, limping is preferred over an aggressive raise. For Hendrix, checking 62o is also standard, though sometimes mixing in a raise is possible to deny equity to the opponent. Flop: Q♥J♠6♣ Bojovic makes a continuation bet of 1,800,000. Hendrix raises to 5,600,000. Bojovic responds with a 3-bet to 10,000,000. Hendrix makes a 4-bet to 15,500,000. Bojovic folds after a long tank. Here’s how the betting unfolded on the flop: Bojovic bets 1,800,000 into a 3,200,000 pot (a minimum bet, just over half the pot). Hendrix raises to 5,600,000, showing strength or a desire to take the pot right away. Bojovic doesn’t back down and reraises to 10,000,000, representing a strong hand or a draw. Hendrix goes even further—4-betting to 15,500,000, which is extremely aggressive given the stack depths and the final table situation. Bojovic thinks for a long time and eventually folds. Hendrix reveals his 6♦2♥ and celebrates with his rail. Poker Terms and Explanations Limp — entering the hand by calling the big blind, without raising. Check — declining to bet, passing the action when there’s no pressure. Continuation bet (c-bet) — a bet by the player who showed initiative on the previous street (here, the first bet on the flop by the limper). Raise — increasing the bet. 3-bet — the second raise in a hand (after a raise). 4-bet — the third raise (after a 3-bet). GTO (Game Theory Optimal) — a strategy that minimizes the possibility of being exploited by opponents. Analysis of Player Decisions from a GTO Perspective The hand was analyzed in detail using GTO Wizard—a specialized software for analyzing optimal decisions in poker. Limp with K9o (Bojovic): The solver recommends limping K9o from the small blind 86.5% of the time. This is standard, especially with short stacks at the table. Check with 62o (Hendrix): The solver suggests mixing check and raise with such weak hands, but check is the most frequent action. Bet 1,800,000 (Bojovic): On a Q♥J♠6♣ board, the solver more often suggests checking, but the EV (expected value) for K9o is the same for checking and betting. If the opponent tends to fold often, betting becomes more profitable. Raise to 5,600,000 (Hendrix): The solver recommends raising only 2.9% of hands in this spot, as the SB has a range advantage. However, the EV of raising and calling with 62o is very close. If Bojovic is betting the flop frequently, the solver increases the BB’s raise frequency. 3-bet to 10,000,000 (Bojovic): The solver advises 3-betting 10.1% of hands, but prefers calling with K9o more often. Still, 3-betting K9o is acceptable at a low frequency. 4-bet to 15,500,000 (Hendrix): The solver usually prefers folding 62o, but for other 62o combos, 4-betting is the highest EV play. Overall, 4-betting 62o is not a mistake or a crazy bluff, but actually quite close to optimal. Folding K9o to the 4-bet (Bojovic): This is the only clear mistake in the hand: according to the solver, K9o should not be folded to this 4-bet size. Calling is more profitable, especially against a player capable of bluffing wider than GTO. Still, at the WSOP Main Event final table, even a pro can find it hard to call with such a hand. Tournament Payouts and Standings (from the original) The original article does not provide a full payout table or final placements, but it is known that at the time of the hand, seven players remained, and Bojovic and Hendrix had two of the largest stacks at the table. Psychology and Pressure of the Final Table The Hendrix vs. Bojovic hand clearly shows how difficult it is to make decisions at the final table of the year’s biggest tournament. Even knowing that calling with K9o is more profitable according to the solver, a player must consider not only the math, but also the pressure of the moment, table dynamics, audience expectations, and their own emotions. By showing aggression and an unconventional approach, Hendrix not only won the pot, but also demonstrated to his opponents that he’s willing to take risks even with marginal hands. This can affect table dynamics and force opponents to play more cautiously against him in the future. For Bojovic, the decision to fold K9o was likely driven by not expecting to see a bluff after a 3-bet on the flop. However, as the analysis shows, against a player like Hendrix, the bluffing range can be wider than standard. GTO Wizard and Learning Modern Strategy GTO Wizard —a popular solver for studying and analyzing optimal poker strategy—was used in this analysis. The program allows you to model hands, compare the EV of different actions, and find optimal lines against various types of opponents. As the breakdown shows, even at the WSOP final table, players strive to stick to GTO strategy to minimize exploitability and make the most profitable decisions. At the same time, deviations from GTO can be justified if you have information about your opponent’s tendencies. Expert Opinions and Additional Information The hand analysis was prepared with the participation of the GTO Wizard team. The original article also highlights experts from the poker community: Connor Richards — Senior Editor at PokerNews USA, host of the Life Outside Poker podcast, and three-time Global Poker Awards journalism nominee. Lukas "RobinPoker" Robinson — professional player, streamer, and content creator, known for the Twitch world record for poker streaming (1,000 hours in 100 days) and for appearing on the show "Game of Gold". You can watch the original hand on the PokerGO YouTube channel (around 9:30 in the video). What This Means for PPPoker Club Players For PPPoker club members, this breakdown is a clear example of how modern poker strategy goes far beyond standard lines. Even at the final table of the world’s most prestigious tournament, players use deep range analysis, mix up their actions, and aren’t afraid to make unconventional moves if they’re justified by math and opponent behavior. The practical takeaway for PPPoker club players: pay attention not only to your own cards, but also to your opponents’ ranges, their tendencies, and table dynamics. Using GTO solvers like GTO Wizard helps you find optimal lines even in tough and unusual spots. Don’t be afraid to deviate from standard play if you see your opponent isn’t following theory. Finally, remember that pressure and psychological factors can influence even the most experienced players’ decisions. Train not only your math skills, but also your ability to stay calm in key hands. This will give you an edge in PPPoker club games and help you win pots even with the most unexpected hands.